Here are a couple of interviews on open-source culture that I did last spring. They’re dense but really quite interesting: portraits of virtual conventions taking on real-life avatars, if you will. Maybe the internet can save the world.
The first is loosely about open-source publishing, and is posted on Maisonneuve‘s website. The second is about using the internet to beef up municipal democracy. It was compiled for the Urban Ecology Centre‘s 2009 Citizen Summit, and isn’t available online, so I had to paste the whole thing here. Longest entry ever.
Remixing The Book World
Christine Prefontaine breaks publishing boundaries.HAVING SPENT YEARS WORKING in communications for international development projects, Christine Prefontaine had long suspected that there was more to be gained than lost from sharing ideas, or even from having them stolen. Not only did sharing seem to solve problems more quickly, but it also raised the profile of the idea’s originator. And it wasn’t ideas that ensured success, she reasoned, but the ability to come up with them—something nobody could steal.
After more than a decade working in the U.S. and pondering how open-source technologies and other forms of “open culture” might affect community, research, and personal success, Prefontaine returned to Montreal last year to find many of her thoughts had become established practice. Volunteers were making free internet increasingly available, freelance workers were sharing space and collaborating, and a local project called LibriVox had created the largest audio-library in the world, entirely drawn from the public domain and available for free.
Without missing a beat, Prefontaine launched a project of her own, Artefatica, which will publish openly-licensed books…Keep Reading
More of Christine’s thoughts and ideas are posted here; the work of Michael, below, is compiled here.
Open-Sourcing Democracy
Imagine a government that wanted you involved.BACK IN THE EARLY 2000s, when the open-source software models that would come to define Web 2.0 were still incubating, a similar revolution was gestating in hardware: wi-fi devices allowing people to use the public spectrum of wireless airspace became cheap enough that consumers could buy them, tinker around, and experiment sharing internet connections with friends, neighbours, and communities.
At the time, Michael Lenczner was one of a few intrepid pioneers intent on bringing open-source internet access to the city, one hotspot at a time. This month, his collaborative volunteer-run start-up Ile Sans Fil set up its 150th free internet zone in this Montreal and passed 100,000 users. Not only that, but it did it using software created by its members – software which has been used to spawn similar projects in 40 cities across four continents.
A home-grown Web 2.0 success story? Maybe, but Lenczner thinks the city’s “open culture” movement has barely begun. Email, website hosting, and the “world’s largest library” are shaping the evolution of this city; when will Montrealers step up to make sure it evolves in the public interest?
Sarah Colgrove: What are some of the possibilities for open culture in this city?
Michael Lenczner: We can be inspired by the open source movement – by accessibility and transparency and participation – to include not only specific groups of people into Montreal life and politics, but to create the widest participation possible. We can do it now because of internet technologies, and there are some successes coming out of this city that embody these ideals of openness and participation.
Citizens could get together and set an agenda for the role of the internet in Montreal. There could be a public internet infrastructure, to make sure that people aren’t left behind, that businesses get the services that they want, and that Montreal can attract tourists. There could be a public agenda involving state, community, and private projects, instead of everything being relegated to the private sphere and federal laws, with only two major service providers competing for contracts.
There is also the possibility to create openness and participation in areas where we could not before. Another project I’ve been working on is taking the federal hansard – the record of what happened in the Canadian parliament every day – and making them easy to access. There’s a record that’s published now, but you can’t search it, you can’t find out how your MP voted, and it’s quite inaccessible, so our project is to take it and make it more accessible to Canadians. The same thing needs to happen for municipal politics.
SC: How exactly do you see technology making participation in Montreal politics more accessible?
ML: Do you know how to find out how your city councilor votes? Why not? Well, it’s almost impossible to find. But what if you could put your email address on a list on the city’s website and get updates about the topics that interest you and the activities of your representative? If you’re interested a bill in the U.S., there are groups doing projects that will send you an update every time the bill gets form one level to the next. Why not here?
For example, right now the city of Montreal publishes online where there was soil contamination. Say you are interested in contamination because you want to make sure that your neighbourhood is cleaned up and that no more pollution enters it. Information is on the internet, but it’s hard to find and inaccessible to read if you have any visual disabilities. The language is not designed to be read by a layperson at all, and you can’t ask the website to track how a situation is progressing or to search an area for you.
At every point it’s designed to keep people away instead of designed for participation. If the information were accessible, you could have different kinds of people collaborating on solutions instead of it only being the responsibility of one department.
SC: How could this kind of accessibility be applied to other aspects of city life?
ML: It would be great to bring together information from the ecoquartiers, the City, and other citizen groups. You could create a system so that if you are interested in the environment, you could look up an area and find out what environmental groups, the City, and businesses are planning for that area, and get involved.
Or, for example, there’s a project where someone is taking info from the city of Montreal website that is fairly accessible and turning it into an iPhone application, so that if you want to know what rink you can play on, instead of consulting a pdf, you can find it as easily as you can find the weather. It’s a good idea: the state of the swimming pools and community gardens should be a transparent system where information is communicated as it occurs.








